Search
Close this search box.

College Basketball Preseason Rankings & Ratings For 2015-16

College Basketball Preseason Rankings & Ratings For 2015-16

November 12, 2015 – by David Hess

We’re finished crunching the numbers, and we’ve loaded our official preseason team ratings for the 2015-2016 college basketball season into our database. These are the ratings that drive our preseason projections, and serve as the Bayesian priors for our predictive ratings as the season progresses.

(Translation: our preseason ratings still impact our team ratings even months into the season, because that has shown to be more predictive than not.)

Just like last season, below you’ll find a preseason top 25 comparison between TeamRankings, Ken Pomeroy, the AP poll, and more. We’ve also posted the full rankings and ratings for all 351 Division I teams.

Using these ratings, we’ve run full season projections, which are live on the site now. Go check’em out! Pages include:

College Basketball Projected Conference Standings. Projected conference records and full regular season records, plus win odds for both the conference regular season title and the postseason tournament.Bracketology Projections. Odds to make the NCAA tournament, plus projected seeding, and lots more details. (One of our faves is the Bracketology By Conference page.)NCAA Tournament Bracket Predictions. Round by round advancement odds, including probability of a team making the Sweet 16, making the Final Four, and winning the championship.

This is all data-driven, and automated, so it will update every day throughout the season.

Ratings Method & Accuracy

The basic idea is that we establish a baseline prediction for a team, given their power ratings from recent years, and assuming an average amount of roster turnover. Then we make some adjustments based on how much value each team is returning on offense and defense, as well as the strength of their recruiting classes from the past few years, and the value of any transfers they’ve added this season.

For a more complete description, check out our blog post from two years ago. The main thing that’s changed since then is simply that we refit the model with another year of data.

Before we get to the rankings themselves, it’s worth noting that Ken Pomeroy has compared our conference win projections with his and a couple other stat-based prognosticators the last three years. In terms of average error, both last year and the year before we finished second best out of four (beating Pomeroy both years, but finishing a hair behind Dan Hanner), and three years ago we finished as the best of three.

We say this not to brag, but to try to preemptively defend ourselves against the inevitable “Team X is WAY too high/low! You don’t know what you’re doing!” comments. While these are by no means perfect rankings, the projections they drive have more than held their own in comparisons with other top projection systems, and we expect them to do so again this season. We’re going to get plenty of individual teams wrong, but that’s inevitable when the challenge is to project 351 teams.

Preseason Top 25 Comparison

Let’s take a look at all the teams that made it into at least one preseason top 25 from among this group:

Our 2015-16 college basketball preseason ratings (TR)Ken Pomeroy’s preseason ratings (KP)Dan Hanner’s preseason rankings, posted at SI.com (DH)AP poll (AP)Coaches poll (Coaches)

The table below lists all such teams, and shows the preseason rank in each system, along with an average rank, and finally a column showing how far TR is from the consensus (positive numbers mean we project a team to rank better than the consensus, and negative is the reverse). Teams are listed in ascending order by average rank.

2015-16 College Basketball Preseason Rankings Comparison
Team TR KP DH AP Coaches AVG TR Diff
N Carolina 1 7 1 1 2 2.4 1.4
Kentucky 5 2 3 2 1 2.6 -2.4
Kansas 2 4 2 4 5 3.4 1.4
Duke 3 1 4 5 4 3.4 0.4
Virginia 4 3 6 6 6 5.0 1.0
Villanova 9 5 8 11 9 8.4 -0.6
Arizona 6 6 11 12 10 9.0 3.0
Gonzaga 8 8 9 9 11 9.0 1.0
Maryland 10 24 5 3 3 9.0 -1.0
Wichita St 7 15 7 10 12 10.2 3.2
Oklahoma 13 11 12 8 8 10.4 -2.6
Iowa St 14 19 10 7 7 11.4 -2.6
Indiana 11 13 14 15 15 13.6 2.6
Michigan St 12 18 15 13 13 14.2 2.2
Utah 16 12 16 16 16 15.2 -0.8
Wisconsin 18 9 34 17 17 19.0 1.0
Notre Dame 25 16 23 19 18 20.2 -4.8
Baylor 17 10 37 22 21 21.4 4.4
SMU 21 23 17 27 22.0 1.0
California 22 47 13 14 14 22.0 0.0
Purdue 19 22 26 23 25 23.0 4.0
Michigan 24 17 27 25 26 23.8 -0.2
Connecticut 27 32 19 20 24 24.4 -2.6
Louisville 20 25 22 32 27 25.2 5.2
Vanderbilt 36 20 33 18 20 25.4 -10.6
Butler 23 29 36 24 22 26.8 3.8
Cincinnati 29 14 31 30 31 27.0 -2.0
Texas 15 34 20 35 34 27.6 12.6
Georgetown 30 27 18 33 30 27.6 -2.4
Miami FL 26 21 25 31 37 28.0 2.0
W Virginia 31 28 32 28 23 28.4 -2.6
LSU 32 49 30 21 19 30.2 -1.8
Xavier 33 31 21 39 36 32.0 -1.0
San Diego St 43 40 24 46 38 38.2 -4.8

A few points stick out:

We rank North Carolina #1, as do Dan Hanner and the AP Poll. The Coaches Poll has Kentucky #1, and Ken Pomeroy has Duke in the top spot.Compared to the crowd, we’re most pessimistic about Vanderbilt, who we rank 3 to 18 spots lower than other projections. Vandy is returning a large fraction of their production from last year, but they weren’t rated all that highly last season, so that returning production isn’t as much of a boone as it would be to a better team. In addition, they have zero consensus top-100 freshman recruits, and their ratings history from the prior few season sets a low baseline for the program.On the other hand, we’re more optimistic about Texas, who we rank 5 to 20 spots higher than other projections. Despite their mediocre record last year, Texas’s power rating was in the top 20 to end the season. Among teams ranked that high, only 6 had better recruiting classes, only 5 returned a higher fraction of their 2014-15 production, and only 1 (Kansas) did both of those things. (Our ratings don’t “know” that Shaka Smart is taking over as head coach, but that doesn’t seem like a bad thing, either.)We’ve got Kentucky ranked #5, while they’re no lower than #3 in other projections. That may not seem like a big difference, but if you look past the ranking and examine the underlying ratings (posted at the end of this article), we have Kentucky closer to being #13 than to being #1.

Why Don’t We Have Kentucky Higher?

Let’s dig a little deeper on our relatively low Kentucky rating. Kentucky has lost star players and reloaded in the past; why would this year be any different? Several reasons:

Our estimates show this year’s team returning only 12% of its 2014-15 production, which would be the third-lowest value in Calipari’s seven year tenure.In addition, the Wildcats lost four first round draft picks from last year’s team; that’s only the third time so much talent has departed Lexington at once.Finally, based on our analysis of the RSCI recruiting rankings, this is Calipari’s second worst incoming freshman class at Kentucky.

The two past Calipari-at-Kentucky seasons with profiles that most closely match the above bullet points are 2010-11 (when a young Kentucky team earned a #4 seed in the NCAA tournament, then made a run to the Final Four the year before winning it all), and 2012-13 (when Kentucky missed the NCAA tournament entirely).

One thing does set this year’s team apart from those two past examples, though — Kentucky’s 2014-15 power rating was by far the highest in Calipari’s tenure. That high baseline means that even if Kentucky’s rating drops as much as it did in those two past examples, the Wildcats will still be a very good team. That’s what keeps them in our top five.

Full Rankings, From #1 To #351

Here’s the full list.

Keep in mind that sometimes teams can be separated by several ranking spots, but have nearly identical ratings. On the flip side of the coin, two teams can be ranked adjacent to each other, but can have a big ratings gap.

This is important at the top of the rankings this season. #1 North Carolina, #2 Kansas, and #3 Duke are separated by less than half a ratings point total. But #4 Virginia is a full 1.4 ratings points behind Duke. So our preseason ratings essentially see a triumvirate of “best teams in the land.”

[UPDATE: After posting these ratings, it was announced that David Collette is leaving Utah State. We’ve the ratings in this post to account for that.]

Rank Team Rating
1 N Carolina 19.7
2 Kansas 19.6
3 Duke 19.4
4 Virginia 18.0
5 Kentucky 17.7
6 Arizona 17.0
7 Wichita St 16.6
8 Gonzaga 16.5
9 Villanova 16.4
10 Maryland 16.3
11 Indiana 15.9
12 Michigan St 15.8
13 Oklahoma 15.3
14 Iowa State 14.6
15 Texas 13.8
16 Utah 13.5
17 Baylor 13.4
18 Wisconsin 13.3
19 Purdue 13.3
20 Louisville 13.3
21 S Methodist 13.2
22 California 13.1
23 Butler 13.1
24 Michigan 13.0
25 Notre Dame 12.8
26 Miami (FL) 12.8
27 Connecticut 12.7
28 Ohio State 12.6
29 Cincinnati 12.3
30 Georgetown 12.2
31 W Virginia 11.9
32 LSU 11.9
33 Xavier 11.8
34 Florida 11.8
35 Pittsburgh 11.6
36 Vanderbilt 11.0
37 VCU 11.0
38 Illinois 11.0
39 Syracuse 10.9
40 Davidson 10.8
41 Oregon 10.7
42 Iowa 10.5
43 San Diego St 10.4
44 Geo Wshgtn 10.4
45 NC State 10.4
46 Oklahoma St 10.3
47 Texas A&M 10.2
48 Valparaiso 10.2
49 UCLA 10.2
50 Rhode Island 9.8
51 Tulsa 9.6
52 Florida St 9.3
53 BYU 9.2
54 GA Tech 8.9
55 Clemson 8.9
56 S Carolina 8.7
57 Dayton 8.6
58 Ste F Austin 8.6
59 Richmond 8.4
60 Memphis 8.3
61 Stony Brook 8.0
62 Oregon St 8.0
63 Georgia 7.9
64 UNLV 7.8
65 Creighton 7.6
66 Boise State 7.5
67 Providence 7.4
68 Iona 7.0
69 Marquette 6.8
70 Illinois St 6.6
71 Minnesota 6.6
72 Colorado 6.5
73 N Iowa 6.5
74 Northwestern 6.4
75 Mississippi 6.4
76 Seton Hall 6.4
77 Evansville 6.3
78 USC 6.1
79 Central Mich 6.1
80 Old Dominion 6.1
81 New Mexico 6.0
82 UAB 5.9
83 Arkansas 5.9
84 Temple 5.8
85 Tennessee 5.8
86 Pepperdine 5.8
87 Stanford 5.7
88 Arizona St 5.6
89 Wake Forest 5.5
90 LA Lafayette 5.5
91 Columbia 5.4
92 S Dakota St 5.3
93 Belmont 5.3
94 Alabama 5.3
95 Vermont 5.1
96 Hofstra 4.9
97 Akron 4.7
98 LA Tech 4.7
99 Miss State 4.5
100 St Josephs 4.5
101 Georgia St 4.2
102 Coastal Car 3.8
103 Colorado St 3.7
104 Utah State 3.7
105 St Bonavent 3.7
106 UCSB 3.6
107 U Mass 3.6
108 Hawaii 3.5
109 La Salle 3.4
110 Princeton 3.4
111 VA Tech 3.3
112 UC Irvine 3.3
113 Yale 3.2
114 Wm & Mary 3.1
115 Auburn 3.0
116 Middle Tenn 3.0
117 Cal Poly 3.0
118 Nebraska 2.9
119 Texas Tech 2.9
120 Kent State 2.8
121 Buffalo 2.7
122 Penn State 2.7
123 Kansas St 2.5
124 Northeastrn 2.4
125 N Florida 2.3
126 Loyola-Chi 2.2
127 Lehigh 2.2
128 St Marys 2.2
129 Wash State 2.1
130 N Mex State 2.1
131 Murray St 2.0
132 DePaul 1.9
133 TX Christian 1.9
134 Indiana St 1.7
135 Fresno St 1.7
136 Boston U 1.7
137 WI-Grn Bay 1.5
138 North Dakota State 1.4
139 Albany 1.4
140 Wofford 1.3
141 Lg Beach St 1.1
142 Bucknell 1.0
143 James Mad 0.8
144 Toledo 0.8
145 Washington 0.8
146 Duquesne 0.7
147 NC Central 0.6
148 Missouri 0.5
149 Chattanooga 0.5
150 Rider 0.4
151 TX El Paso 0.4
152 Saint Louis 0.3
153 New Jersey Tech 0.2
154 Montana 0.1
155 High Point 0.1
156 Harvard -0.1
157 W Michigan -0.2
158 St Johns -0.2
159 Detroit -0.2
160 Geo Mason -0.3
161 NW State -0.3
162 San Diego -0.4
163 Houston -0.4
164 Ball State -0.5
165 E Michigan -0.5
166 Miami (OH) -0.6
167 Oakland -0.6
168 Weber State -0.6
169 Wyoming -0.8
170 N Hampshire -0.9
171 Wright State -0.9
172 Monmouth -1.0
173 Manhattan -1.1
174 San Fransco -1.1
175 Pacific -1.1
176 Portland -1.1
177 Sam Hous St -1.1
178 Army -1.2
179 Mercer -1.2
180 E Washingtn -1.4
181 Canisius -1.5
182 Nevada -1.5
183 Delaware -1.6
184 Boston Col -1.7
185 Bowling Grn -1.7
186 E Carolina -1.7
187 W Kentucky -1.8
188 LA Monroe -2.0
189 Cleveland St -2.0
190 Fordham -2.0
191 NC-Wilmgton -2.0
192 Missouri St -2.0
193 Drexel -2.1
194 UC Riverside -2.1
195 American -2.2
196 TX A&M-CC -2.3
197 Santa Clara -2.3
198 E Kentucky -2.3
199 S Illinois -2.4
200 Oral Roberts -2.4
201 WI-Milwkee -2.5
202 Fairfield -2.6
203 LIU-Brooklyn -2.6
204 U Penn -2.6
205 S Florida -2.7
206 Morehead St -2.7
207 Mt St Marys -2.8
208 Marshall -2.9
209 Denver -2.9
210 Rutgers -2.9
211 Norfolk St -2.9
212 Rob Morris -3.0
213 UC Davis -3.0
214 Grand Canyon -3.0
215 Central FL -3.1
216 Dartmouth -3.2
217 Rice -3.2
218 Towson -3.2
219 AR Lit Rock -3.2
220 Tulane -3.3
221 TX-Arlington -3.4
222 South Carolina Upstate -3.5
223 Loyola-MD -3.5
224 Drake -3.5
225 Texas State -3.5
226 N Illinois -3.5
227 St Fran (NY) -3.6
228 TX Southern -3.6
229 Fla Gulf Cst -3.6
230 TN Martin -3.7
231 Charlotte -3.7
232 Air Force -3.8
233 Ohio -3.9
234 NC-Grnsboro -4.1
235 Hampton -4.1
236 W Carolina -4.1
237 S Alabama -4.2
238 IPFW -4.3
239 Arkansas St -4.3
240 Fla Atlantic -4.5
241 SE Missouri -4.7
242 Furman -4.7
243 N Arizona -4.8
244 E Tenn St -4.8
245 Winthrop -4.8
246 VA Military -4.9
247 CS Fullerton -4.9
248 Col Charlestn -4.9
249 Brown -5.0
250 CS Bakersfld -5.0
251 Bryant -5.0
252 Lafayette -5.1
253 TN State -5.1
254 Elon -5.2
255 Sacred Hrt -5.2
256 Holy Cross -5.2
257 Incarnate Word -5.3
258 App State -5.3
259 Lamar -5.4
260 Idaho -5.4
261 TN Tech -5.5
262 Quinnipiac -5.5
263 Siena -5.6
264 Portland St -5.6
265 NC-Asheville -5.7
266 IUPUI -5.7
267 W Illinois -5.8
268 St Peters -5.8
269 Gard-Webb -5.9
270 GA Southern -6.0
271 Wagner -6.0
272 Nebraska Omaha -6.0
273 TX-San Ant -6.1
274 St Fran (PA) -6.1
275 UMKC -6.1
276 Sac State -6.1
277 Lipscomb -6.3
278 S Mississippi -6.4
279 Florida Intl -6.4
280 South Dakota -6.5
281 Northern Kentucky -6.5
282 Hartford -6.6
283 SE Louisiana -6.6
284 Loyola Mymt -6.7
285 Howard -6.7
286 Colgate -6.7
287 Youngs St -6.8
288 Radford -6.8
289 Cornell -6.8
290 Navy -6.9
291 E Illinois -6.9
292 Jackson St -6.9
293 Southern -7.1
294 Seattle -7.3
295 S Utah -7.3
296 Cal St Nrdge -7.4
297 Charl South -7.4
298 NC A&T -7.5
299 IL-Chicago -7.5
300 North Texas -7.6
301 Maryland ES -7.6
302 Austin Peay -7.8
303 Samford -7.9
304 N Colorado -8.0
305 Troy -8.0
306 Campbell -8.1
307 Jacksonville -8.1
308 Binghamton -8.3
309 Utah Val St -8.3
310 Bradley -8.4
311 Houston Bap -8.6
312 Massachusetts Lowell -8.7
313 New Orleans -8.7
314 Alabama St -8.8
315 Niagara -8.9
316 Marist -8.9
317 Morgan St -8.9
318 Longwood -8.9
319 Alab A&M -9.2
320 SIU Edward -9.7
321 McNeese St -9.9
322 Maine -10.0
323 F Dickinson -10.0
324 Montana St -10.1
325 Stetson -10.1
326 Savannah St -10.4
327 North Dakota -10.5
328 Beth-Cook -10.5
329 Presbyterian -10.7
330 Delaware St -10.9
331 Chicago St -11.0
332 Jksnville St -11.1
333 Nicholls St -11.2
334 S Car State -11.3
335 Prairie View -11.4
336 Idaho State -11.7
337 TX-Pan Am -11.7
338 Abilene Christian -12.1
339 Central Conn -12.2
340 San Jose St -12.2
341 Ark Pine Bl -12.2
342 Maryland BC -12.5
343 Citadel -12.9
344 Liberty -13.1
345 Kennesaw St -14.0
346 Alcorn State -14.3
347 Central Ark -14.8
348 Coppin State -17.4
349 Florida A&M -17.7
350 Miss Val St -20.0
351 Grambling St -23.3

As a final reminder, be sure to check out the season projections we create using these ratings. There’s a ton to see:

College Basketball Projected Conference Standings. Projected conference records and full regular season records, plus win odds for both the conference regular season title and the postseason tournament.Bracketology Projections. Odds to make the NCAA tournament, plus projected seeding, and lots more details.NCAA Tournament Bracket Predictions. Round by round advancement odds, including probability of a team making the Sweet 16, making the Final Four, and winning the championship.

If you liked this post, please share it. Thank you! Twitter Facebook

NFL Football Pool Picks NFL Survivor Pool Picks NCAA Bracket Picks College Bowl Pool Picks College Football Pool Picks NFL Picks NBA Picks MLB Picks College Football Picks College Basketball Picks NFL Predictions NBA Predictions MLB Predictions College Football Predictions College Basketball Predictions NFL Spread Picks NBA Spread Picks MLB Spread Picks College Football Spread Picks College Basketball Spread Picks NFL Rankings NBA Rankings MLB Rankings College Football Rankings College Basketball Rankings NFL Stats NBA Stats MLB Stats College Football Stats College Basketball Stats NFL Odds NBA Odds MLB Odds College Football Odds College Basketball Odds A product ofTeamRankings BlogAboutTeamJobsContact

© 2005-2024 Team Rankings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Statistical data provided by Gracenote.

TeamRankings.com is not affiliated with the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA®) or March Madness Athletic Association, neither of which has supplied, reviewed, approved or endorsed the material on this site. TeamRankings.com is solely responsible for this site but makes no guarantee about the accuracy or completeness of the information herein.

Terms of ServicePrivacy Policy

Share the Post:

Related Posts